GMO Humans, Baby Farms, Uterus Implantation

Implanted embryos being born as healthy babies is already passé. If you have the money, someone will do the procedure for you, whether you are part of a couple or not. There is a new twist on baby implants, genetic testing before implantation. On the surface, genetic testing sounds really swell.

A woman’s fertilized eggs may be tested for certain genetic illnesses. If any of the fertilized eggs test positive, the egg is not implanted, and a another approved fertilized egg is implanted instead. Like Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) crops, and cloned animals, we have the technology. We will soon have the technology to produce designer babies.

Genetic testing may have a positive effect on an individual and the parents who raise them. Many horrible diseases, emphysema, dementia, certain cancers, many other diseases may be prevented before a fetus is developed, or implantation is performed.

This technology has wonderful application which may be of great benefit to individual parents and the world in general. How comforting it would be to know your child will not develop a genetically prone disease from your genes, thanks to, In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) selection, it will be prevented or downgraded before implantation and development.

Custom Babies, and Uterus Implants, where are we going with technology?

A major disadvantage is how this technology will likely be applied. It probably won’t wind up being used for poor families in India, Africa, and other poor nations or countries, who have a surplus of people, and a deficit of resources. It will be used for additional trials and testing, and by those who can afford the cost. The price tag of IVF already restricts itself to the wealthy. Genetic testing before implantation raise the cost considerably.

Implications exist as this relates to gene therapy trials. Every process or procedure is safe until something unforeseen happens. Who wants to be the parents of an enhanced embryo which grows into a child, and later develops a terminal disease linked to some little understood gene combination and selection process?

Are there serious moral and ethical issues with designer babies? Some issues will be addressed by each couple in turn. Society as a whole will have its say. What will happen if a nation decides what its citizens should look like, and starts using genetic testing to eliminate unwanted skin, hair, or eye colors before implantation. What if testing to eliminate unwanted babies is done? Will we start producing children that will start to look like the Aliens of our imagination when grown adults?

Once a technology is made possible and published, it is out of the control of well wishers and loose in the real wold. IVF and Human GMO is destined to find acceptance in possible military technology. On the other side, abortion gives support to the idea of genetic testing and implantation. Agree with abortion or not, discarding or not implanting an embryo is less distasteful than aborting a developing fetus.

If these ideas sound a little far fetched, uterus implantation for the wealthy and childless woman is here. Soon, with enough money, a woman may have her uterus replaced with a healthy uterus, give birth to a baby, and have the uterus removed before organ rejection occurs. The Human future is either looking very exciting, or very scary, depending on how you see this use of technology. Where should we go with our technology, let it free, or reign it in?

12/02/17 – On Yahoo today, Uterus transplant patient gives birth

Creation, Evolution, or Intelligent Design

With Christmas fast approaching, perhaps it is time to reflect on how we got here, and where we are going? Probably not to Grandmothers house on a one horse open sleigh, or to the buffet for an all we can eat. Rather some thinking on what we think or believe about how human beings came about. I presented both sides in short paragraphs. What do you think about where we came from? Who’s right and who’s got it wrong?

How did we get here and where are we going? How you answer is important.

Biodiversity is more important to human survival than the numbers of humans that survive. Less than a century ago, antibiotics were thought of as the end all for infectious diseases. Today these same antibiotics in there original form are almost worthless. Now we are tinkering with genetics, because we ‘know’ we are more educated today. In the near future we will discover the same end result, only magnified by our tinkering.

An argument can be made that Buffalo created and maintained the Midwest plains area of our country. We killed most of the Buffalo, and put wheat, corn and cattle in their place, adding prodigious amounts of chemicals each year to the ecosystem, to keep the food chain producing, hoping for a future fix to cure the extensive damage we create today. All this in less than a few hundred years.

Most Human hardship is a direct result of human intervention and tinkering. We modified ‘primitive’ cultures, forcing them to abandon a lifestyle that kept ecosystems in balance for thousands of years. We created Frankenstein systems that can no longer support itself, all the while adding more humans to already overcrowded and starving populations, while we hope for a new ‘miracle cure’, to fix what we have created. We are out of miracles when it comes to our biosphere, and we need to come to terms with this.